Vitaly Gogunsky continues to contest a court decision on child support for his daughter Milana Star. The actress Irina Maerk claims that the basic minimum for the 16‑year‑old, who is featured in the series “Star,” is 330 000 rubles per month. Vitaly’s attorneys argue that he does not receive such income, insisting that his actual earnings are much lower. According to the latest calculations, the amount required for the girl’s upbringing could exceed 300 000 rubles monthly. commented a source familiar with the case, hinting that the dispute is based on incomplete financial data.
Irina’s legal team now uses a different method to assess Vitaly’s earnings. They point out that Gogunsky received 20 million rubles for his role in the series “Univer,” and that his daily fee during filming allegedly reaches 280 000 rubles. Using these figures, the team says the accumulated alimony debt already amounts to about 10 million rubles. Vitaly’s side rejects these numbers, arguing that deductions for taxes, agent fees and living expenses reduce the actual disposable income. The conflict continues in court, with each side presenting its own version of the actress’s necessary expenses. Observers note that the case highlights broader problems with proving income in entertainment contracts.
Additional background shows that the actress has not submitted official tax statements, according to Irina’s lawyers. Instead, the court receives self‑prepared documents that Vitaly’s side claims are not representative of his real finances. Because of the lack of transparent data, judges are finding it difficult to decide on a fair monthly amount. Meanwhile, the actress’s team says that without sufficient support the girl cannot maintain her previous lifestyle, such as using transport other than the subway. Public opinion on social media is split: some users sympathize with the actress’s pursuit of stability for the child, while others doubt the legitimacy of the claimed earnings. The case is likely to continue for months as both parties gather more evidence.
According to legal analysts, judges often rely on gross revenue figures when calculating alimony, but they may also consider deductions for taxes and work‑related expenses. In celebrity cases, monthly payments can vary dramatically because income is irregular and sometimes concealed. Experts stress that both sides should provide verified financial records rather than estimates to avoid prolonging disputes. The courtroom drama illustrates the challenges of evaluating modern earnings in family law, especially when one partner controls public branding and the other seeks transparent support for a minor. Whatever the outcome, the ruling will set a precedent for how similar disputes are handled in the future.
AiGENDA can help you turn such legal and financial information into clear summaries, generate drafts for court documents, or create easy‑to‑read timelines of the case. Whether you need to explain complex earnings structures, prepare argument outlines, or simply improve your understanding of the situation, the AiGENDA platform offers fast, accurate tools powered by artificial intelligence. Try it now at AiGENDA and see how AI can make your work smoother!
